← The land

Farm PAR-000070

Part of Rhemhoogte No. 125

Kareemoerhoek (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 4)

4/125 on the cadastre · on record 1884–1937 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 125
Portion
4
Also recorded as
KareemoerhoekDIAGRAM 4241/1937, deed 13528/1937KareemoershoekSRC-436, 2023 valuation roll
On the cadastre
4/125, portionregistered as RHEMHOOGTE
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
1654.0080 morgen
Modern surveyed area
1561.1 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

John Peter Oosthuizen held it. 14 km from Klaarstroom.

John Peter Oosthuizen is on record on this ground directly. No trace needed.

Stories

What the record holds, in order

  1. 1884-01-25 to 1937-12-20 ownership John Peter Oosthuizen (1863–1955)
    transfer · confidence medium
  2. 1937 boundary change subdivision: from Rhemhoogte No. 125
  3. 1937 boundary change subdivision: from Groot Sleutelfontein (Rhemhoogte No. 125 Ptn 2)
  4. February 1937 document SG diagram 4241/1937
    13528
  5. 20 December 1937 ownership Anna Margaretha Oosthuizen (5 October 1879–3 December 1973)
    transfer · confidence medium

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 4241/1937, February 1937 Surveyor-General diagram, 4241/1937, February 1937
101BEH01 1937.jpg

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

Surveyed Feb 1937 by J.F.E. Hartwig (DOC-0085): "Portion 4 (Kareemoerhoek), a portion of Portion 2 [Lot A] of the farm Rhemhoogte No 125". Transferred 20.12.1937, deed 13528, to a transferee whose typed name is faint: "... born OOSTHUIZEN, married out of community of property to ... MARINCOWITZ" [TO VERIFY] (OWN-000063). Antecedent: dgms 1316/1883 and 1350/1883, Transfer Deed 341 of 25.1.1884 in favour of J.P. OOSTHUIZEN (OWN-000062). Cadastre 4/125 measures 1,561.7 ha vs 1,654.008 mg = 1,416.7 ha - 10% apart, LEAD-0007 discipline: do not present as confirming. Neighbours: Groot Sleutel Fontein (Rem.), Noorsdoringkop, Klein Botterkraal, Klein Plaats, MIDDLE WATER, Remr of Reimhoogte, Lot E.

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-208] ITS ANTECEDENT IS NOW HELD. This row cites 'dgms 1316/1883 and 1350/1883, Transfer Deed 341 of 25.1.1884 in favour of J.P. OOSTHUIZEN' without holding either diagram. 1350/1883 is now DOC-0174: Lot A of the subdivided Portion 1, 2108 morgen 338 sq roods, surveyed by P. S. Dale in July 1883, and its face carries Transfer 341 of 25.1.1884 - the same number and the same date. Kareemoerhoek is the LOT B named as its eastern neighbour.

[3 Aug 2026] ITS DIAGRAM NUMBER, from the verso of the Portion 2 sheet: KAART 4241/1937, survey record E.771/1937. The same line gives the extent as 1654,0080 morgen and the transfer as 13528/1937 - both of which this row already carried off the face of DOC-0085 - so the identification rests on three fields agreeing, not on one.

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Kareemoerhoek (Rhemhoogte Ptn 4)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.