← The land

Farm PAR-000153

Part of Cyferfontein No. 115

Paardefontein (Cyferfontein No. 115 Ptn 2)

2/115 on the cadastre · on record 1916 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 115
Portion
2
On the cadastre
2/115, portionregistered as CYFERFONTEIN
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
3286 morgen 200 square roods
Modern surveyed area
2708.9 ha

The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.

Why this farm is here

A piece of a farm already in this model. 38 km from Klaarstroom.

What the record holds, in order

  1. August 1916 document SG diagram 1640/1916
  2. undated boundary change subdivision: from Cyferfontein No. 115

Bordered by, as the diagram names them

Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it

Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.

Documents

Scan of Surveyor-General diagram, 1640/1916, August 1916 Surveyor-General diagram, 1640/1916, August 1916
10742947 112 2.pdf

Cadastre

Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel

Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.

Research notes

[3 Aug 2026, SRC-247] A NAMED PORTION - exactly what LEAD-0067 is about. The margin of the diagram reads "Portion 2 - Paardefontein (a portion of portion) of the farm Cyferfontein No. 115, PRINCE ALBERT", and the body: 3286 morgen 200 square roods in the Division of Prince Albert, FIELD CORNETCY OF TRAKA No. 3, "being Paardefontein, part of the Farm Cyferfontein granted to J.L. Strydom on the 15th April 1841". Surveyed and beaconed August 1916 by A.J. de VilliersM, Government Land Surveyor; deducted No. 2440, 19 October 1916. BOUNDED: NW by Wolve Kraal; E, N and NE by the Remainder, and from X to Y THE MIDDLE OF THE KOUKA RIVER IS THE BOUNDARY; S by Toornits Kraal and Lot No. 1 of Cyferfontein; W by Klipgat. THE TRANSFER, 22 May 1917, is stamped on the sheet: in favour of "M.E.C. Venter, born Swanepoel, married out of community to W.A. Venter" - a Venter and a Swanepoel, two of this project's families, holding ground between Klipgat and the Kouka. IDENTITY NOT ASSERTED, because 9 forbids matching on a name alone and this is initials. The model holds TWO women called Maria Elizabeth Catharina SwanepoelL alive in 1917 (PER-000581, b. 1888; PER-000711, b. 1884), and a Willem Adriaan VenterM (PER-000107) whose recorded floruit is 1879-1897, twenty years earlier. Plausible on all three counts and proved on none. LEAD-0070. No cadastral polygon: the extract holds only the parent 115 (7 346,5 ha), no portions. This portion is 3 286 1/3 morgen, about 2 815 ha, roughly 38% of the parent. [TO VERIFY]

[4 Aug 2026] plc_id was blank, so match_cadastre.py skipped this row entirely - it matches only within a registration division and a blank plc_id yields no division. Set to PLC-000001, Prince Albert.

*** [4 Aug 2026] sg_farm_key WAS 'NO-POLYGON' AND THAT WAS FALSE. *** The sentinel asserts that this ground has no cadastral counterpart, which is what 5 reserves it for - a vernacular name like Drooge Kloof that no diagram ever carried. This parcel is not that: the Surveyor-General publishes its polygon under the exact key its own farm and portion number imply, and it was sitting in geo/prince_albert_*.geojson the whole time. The sentinel is cleared so match_cadastre.py can do its job. Reasoning from absence, stated as fact - the same mistake as Drooge Kloof and Modderdrift, both recorded in 5a.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.