Part of Klein Valie No. 182
Oude Kraal (Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 1)
1/182 on the cadastre · on record 1912–1940 · show on the map
The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.
- Farm number
- No. 182
- Portion
- 1
- On the cadastre
- 1/182, portionregistered as KLEIN VALIE
- District
- Prince Albert
- Extent, as the diagram states it
- 2102 morgen 186 square roods
- Modern surveyed area
- 1793.1 ha
The historic extent and the modern surveyed area are two separate measurements and are not presented here as confirming each other. The first is what a surveyor wrote on a diagram, usually in morgen. The second is what the modern cadastre draws.
Why this farm is here
A piece of a farm already in this model. 14 km from Klaarstroom.
- parcel Cut out of Klein Valie No. 182
- parcel Ground cut out of this farm: Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 10 (out of Oude Kraal)
- document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0222
- document A document in the collection describes this ground DOC-0223
What the record holds, in order
- 1912 boundary change subdivision: from Klein Valie No. 182
- July 1912 document SG diagram 2115/1912
- 1938–1940 boundary change subdivision: becomes Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 10 (out of Oude Kraal)
- 1940 document SG diagram verso 2115/1912 (verso)
Also bordered by, as the modern cadastre draws it
Ground that touches this farm on the Surveyor-General's current polygons and that none of the diagrams held here names. Derived from the geometry, not read off a document.
- N Venters Kloof Annex No. 183
- E Klein Valie No. 182
- E Gideon's Hoop (Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 4)
- SE Drie Punt No. 181
- W Nieuwe Kraal (Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 3)
- NW Klaarstroom No. 184 (Klaarstroom A)
Documents
10TVUR01.jpg
Cadastre
Surveyor-General diagram index for this parcel
Surveyor-General diagram index for the whole farm — where the original survey of this ground sits.
Research notes
[5 Aug 2026 inbox] Portion 1 of Klein Valie No. 182, NAMED OUDE KRAAL on its own diagram 2115/1912 (K.M. von OppellM, July 1912), Field-Cornetcy of Kredouw. The sheet gives the whole figure a.b.c.d.e.f as 2102 morgen 186 square roods and the portion itself, a'.b'.c.d'.e', as 1737 morgen. Bounded N by Crown Land and land granted to C. HattingM 15 April 1841; E by Gideons Hoop; SE by Tafel Berg and Crown Land; W by Nieuwe Kraal. Deducted No. 2859, 28 Oct 1912. Copied from the diagram relating to Transfer 11089 dated 8.10.1919. Servitude water canals PQ, RS vide D/T 4072/1940, SG 6.5.1940. Portion 10 (12.0301 morgen) was later cut out of it. EXTENT CORRECTED 5 Aug 2026: the sheet carries TWO figures and the first reading here took the wrong one. 'Area Fig. a.b.c.d.e.f. 2102 Morgen 186 Square Roods' is von Oppell's own 1912 survey; 'the diagram lettered a'.b'.c.d'.e'. represents 1737 Morgen' is the PRIMED figure, which his report says is the old boundary he differed from and drew in red. The modern cadastral polygon measures 1,794.6 ha against 1,800.9 ha for 2102 mg 186 sr - agreement to 0.4% - so the ground registered today is his survey, not the older line.
[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Oude Kraal (Klein Valie Ptn 1)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.
The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.
What the record is missing
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Oude Kraal (Klein Valie No. 182 Ptn 1) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.