← The land

Farm PAR-000056

Part of Wolwekraal No. 17

Swanepoel's Aanleg (Swanepoelsaanleg)

· on record 1857–1897 · show on the map

The farm's own history, the grant, the original survey, sits on that page.

Farm number
No. 17
District
Prince Albert
Extent, as the diagram states it
2000 morgen (1857); 1458 morgen transferred 1879

This parcel has no matched survey polygon, so it cannot be drawn on the map. That is a gap in the cadastre match, not an absence from the record.

Why this farm is here

Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5) held it. Connected to the Oosthuizen, Marincowitz or Van der Merwe lines BY MARRIAGE, not by blood, 6 steps on the shortest path. Not yet placed on the map.

  1. Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5)
  2. child of Pieter Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7)
  3. married to Johanna Jacomina Petronella Catharina Venter
  4. child of Maria Catharina Venter
  5. child of Jan Louis Venter
  6. parent of Adriana Cecilia Venter
  7. parent of Johannes Adriaan Oosthuizen

Each step is a recorded parentage or marriage in this model, and the shortest one the record supports, follow the names to check it.

Stories

What the record holds, in order

  1. 10 March 1857 boundary change subdivision: from Venterskraal (Wolwekraal portion)
  2. 1857-03-10 to 1879-04-22 ownership Jacobus Johannes Swanepoel (b6c5d7e5) (7 November 1831–?)
    freehold · subdivision · confidence high
  3. 1879-04-22 to 1897-12-14 ownership Frederik Hendrik Swanepoel (b6c5d7e3) (16 April 1827–8 September 1909)
    freehold · transfer · confidence high
  4. 1879 lived here Frederik Hendrik Swanepoel (b6c5d7e3) (16 April 1827–8 September 1909)
    farming
  5. 14 December 1897 ownership Willem Adriaan Venter
    freehold · transfer · confidence high

Research notes

[SRC-072] Cut from Venterskraal and registered to Jacobus Johannes SwanepoelH on the same day the parent farm was split, 10 Mar 1857 (transport 151). A farm named for the family that took it. Sold out of the family 14 Dec 1897. [29 Jul 2026, verification pass] Cadastre match stripped: this parcel wore Wolwekraal No.17's whole-farm record (11,464 ha) - a 2,000-morgen portion cut from Venterskraal cannot be the whole farm. No modern record named Swanepoelsaanleg exists in the division; all of farm 17's pieces carry "WOLVE KRAAL". Left unmatched.

[1 Aug 2026, from the LEAD-0007 extent audit] EXTENT OUTLIER, FLAGGED NOT FIXED. The record says 2,000 morgen = 1,713 ha; the matched cadastre polygon is 11,464 ha, six and a half times larger. Every other disagreement in the model runs the other way, a historic whole against a modern portion. Larger reads as a match to a CONSOLIDATED modern farm that has absorbed neighbouring ground, which would make the polygon right for the name and wrong for the 2,000-morgen grant. [TO VERIFY] against the farm's own diagram and deduction table.

*** GEOMETRY WITHDRAWN 1 Aug 2026. IT WAS DRAWN AT NEARLY SEVEN TIMES ITS SIZE, ON TOP OF ITS OWN NEIGHBOUR. *** This row carries farm_no 17 and no portion, so the matcher gave it the WHOLE-FARM polygon of Wolwekraal No. 17 - the identical key PAR-000054 holds, 11,464 ha - against a recorded extent of 2,000 morgen, which is 1,713 ha. Ratio 6.7. Wolwekraal's own match is sound at 0.92, so the two rows were sharing one polygon and one of them had to be wrong. Swanepoel's Aanleg is a PORTION of farm 17, not the farm. Which portion is not determinable from what is held: the candidates in the cadastre are 4/17 at 1,392.7 ha, 5/17 at 1,351.3 ha, 12/17 at 1,349.7 ha and 11/17 at 1,592.7 ha, and none is a clean fit to either 2,000 morgen or the 1,458 morgen transferred in 1879. Guessing one would repeat the mistake that put Haggas 104 km wrong, so it carries NO-POLYGON until a diagram says. [TO VERIFY] the Wolwekraal deduction table.

The research behind this page, kept separate from it: dated working notes, open questions, and what is not yet settled.

Open questions

What the record is missing

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.