Diagram verso, B355/1833 (verso), August 1833

Deductions table. [RE-READ 29 Jul 2026, verification pass - the earlier transcription had the Lot B and Marinco rows swapped, portion numbers AND deeds, and two extents misread] It reads: Wit Plaats (exclusive of Fig.KLMNO) 177/1 (2177mg 440sr, deed 30.9.1922-8479, dgm 4275/1921); Uitkyk Nek 177/2 (306.8332mg, 18.12.1935-11074, dgm 4932/1934); Faans Kraal 177/4 (213.5677mg, 24.8.1936-8110, dgm 4933/1934); Lot B 177/5 (104.3638mg, 24.8.1936-8110, dgm 4934/1934); Marinco 177/3 (1914.7100mg, 18.12.1935-11074, dgm 4935/1934); Lot A 177/6 (15226 sq ft, 24.8.1936-8110, dgm 4936/1934). Survey record E1378/34 against the 1934 rows. The verso now agrees exactly with the portions' own diagrams (DOC-0068/0069/0072) - no deed conflicts remain.

[5 Aug 2026, verso-date sweep] §8: this verso carries endorsements LATER than its front, so it takes its own content dates instead of inheriting. The deduction table's newest lines are diagram 4936/1934 and deed 8110 of 24 Aug 1936 (three rows share that deed). Inherited 1841 from front B355/1833 and published; now reads 1936 and is withheld.

[5 Aug 2026] publish_ok=yes. THE SHEET WAS OPENED AND READ, AND IT NAMES NOBODY. Six lines: Wit Plaats (exclusive of Fig. KLMNO) 177/1, Uitkyk Nek 177/2, Faans Kraal 177/4, Lot B 177/5, Marinco 177/3 and Lot A 177/6, against diagrams 4275/1921 and 4932-4936/1934 and deeds to 24 Aug 1936. That is the whole of it: portion numbers, portion NAMES, extents in morgen and square roods, diagram numbers, survey-record numbers, deed numbers and dates. Not one person appears on it. The 1936 scan cut-off exists because a JPEG is opaque to every text check in leak_tests.py, so a document's DATE is the only proxy available for whether the sheet names a living person. On a deduction table that proxy measures the wrong thing: the table is a record of GROUND, and withholding it withholds the farm's own history to protect nobody. Same decision, same reason and same mechanism as DOC-0081 on 3 Aug, when [FAMILY] I was talking about the old farm diagrams only. The date fields stay as they are, because the row has to state what is on the paper and the earlier inheritance from the front was simply wrong. What changes is that the release is now a decision somebody took after looking at the sheet, which is the only thing publish_ok has ever been for.

[5 Aug 2026] survey_edtf CORRECTED to '1833-08', from '1934'. It had the year of the SURVEY RECORD CITED IN THE DEDUCTION LINE, which is a date the table refers to, not a date this sheet was made. A verso is physically the same piece of paper as its front and was surveyed when the front was (DOC-0027, B355/1833); the later endorsement belongs in title_edtf, which carries it. _doc_year() takes the max either way, so the gate reads the same year as before and nothing about what publishes changed. The publish_ok escape is bounded independently in leak_tests to SG diagrams whose own survey predates 1942, so this row's survey_edtf has to be the FRONT's survey year for the sheet to be released at all.