Leeukraal Nr. 24 (consolidated)

24 op die kadaster · op rekord 1947–1948 · wys op die kaart

Plaasnommer: Nr. 24
Op die kadaster: 24, heel plaasgeregistreer as LEEUKRAAL
Distrik: Prince Albert
Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel: 8347.0012 morgen
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 7191.0 ha

Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 38 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Antjiesfontein (Leeukraal Nr. 24 Gdlt 1)
perseel Related to Zeekoegate
perseel Related to: Antjiesfontein (Leeukraal Nr. 24 Gdlt 1)
dokument 'n Dokument in die versameling beskryf hierdie grond DOC-0251
…en nog 1, volledig gelys verder af op hierdie bladsy.

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

Mei 1947 document SG diagram 8870/47
Sertifikaat van Gekonsolideerde Titel 2168H of 21.9.1948
Mei 1947 document SG diagram verso 8870/47 (verso)
transfer 2168/48
21 September 1948 boundary change consolidated into: from Zeekoegate
21 September 1948 boundary change becomes: becomes Antjiesfontein (Leeukraal Nr. 24 Gdlt 1)

Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny

Antjiesfontein (Leeukraal Nr. 24 Gdlt 1) 1/24 · 3168.9 ha

Begrens deur, soos die kaart hulle noem

N Klein Antjes Fontein
NW Restant van Antjes Fontein
W Gedeelte 6 van Antjes Fontein
E Trakas Kuilen
SE Restant van Wit Poortje
S Restant van Zeekoe Gat
SW Zeekoegat

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

NE Trakas Kuilen Nr. 15
NE Trakas Kuilen Nr. 15 Gdlt 1
E Antjiesfontein (Leeukraal Nr. 24 Gdlt 1)
E Wit Poortje Nr. 16
S Zeekoegate
S Plaas 222
W Plaas 215
W Waterval (Farm 215 Gdlt 1)
NW Antjesfontein Nr. 14

Dokumente

catalogued, no scan held

Landmeter-generaal-kaart, 8870/47, Mei 1947
10FL4E01 24 0.jpg

catalogued, no scan held

Kaart se keersy, 8870/47 (verso), Mei 1947
10FL4P01 24 0.jpg

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Navorsingsnotas

A FARM MADE BY CONSOLIDATION IN 1948, not by grant. Kaart van Gekonsolideerde Titel, art. 24(c) of Act 9 of 1927, L.G. 8870/47, surveyed May 1947 by J.P.E. Hartwig and approved by the Surveyor-General on 17 March 1948; attached to Certificate of Consolidated Title 2168H of 21 September 1948. IT WAS MADE OF THREE PIECES, and two of them came off a farm this project already holds: (1) the REMAINDER OF SMALDEEL, diagram 1044/1873 - the sheet has an earlier number struck through and 1044/1873 written in; (2) a GEDEELTE VAN ZEEKOEGAT, diagram 203/1867, T.A. 1867.19.188; (3) a GEDEELTE VAN ZEEKOE GAT, diagram 166/1895, T.A. 1895.16.1123. The figure runs down the middle of the TRAKA RIVER. Beacons are klipstapels around railway sleepers and iron posts.

[7 Aug 2026] PINNED to the cadastre on key W052C061000000000024000000. The diagram gives 8347.0012 morgen = 7150 ha and the modern polygon measures 7194 ha, a difference of 1%.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

Which Rondabel - Tarka (east) or Traka (Koup)? prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0014
Do the 1818 du Plessis and 1823 de Bruin inventories ('leeningsplaats Rondabel aan de Tarca / in Tarka') describe the Prince Albert Rondabel No. 124 (PAR-000009), or a namesake loan farm in the eastern-Cape Tarka?

Wat dit sou uitmaak Placing Greyling's or van Wyk's veldkornetskap, or a loan-farm register entry locating the leeningsplaats Rondabel.

Wat die rekord kortkom

“Klein Antjes Fontein” is named as a neighbour 3 times and we hold no parcel for it second order · B3 unheld-farm
3 separate surveys in this model put Klein Antjes Fontein on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000178, PAR-000179, PAR-000181). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
“Gedeelte 6 van Antjes Fontein” is named as a neighbour 2 times and we hold no parcel for it third order · B3 unheld-farm
2 separate surveys in this model put Gedeelte 6 van Antjes Fontein on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000178, PAR-000179). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
“Restant van Wit Poortje” is named as a neighbour 2 times and we hold no parcel for it third order · B3 unheld-farm
2 separate surveys in this model put Restant van Wit Poortje on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000178, PAR-000179). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
“Restant van Zeekoe Gat” is named as a neighbour 2 times and we hold no parcel for it third order · B3 unheld-farm
2 separate surveys in this model put Restant van Zeekoe Gat on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000178, PAR-000179). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
“Trakas Kuilen” is named as a neighbour 2 times and we hold no parcel for it third order · B3 unheld-farm
2 separate surveys in this model put Trakas Kuilen on the boundary of ground we do hold (PAR-000178, PAR-000179). It has no parcel of its own here, so nothing is known about who held it or when, while it borders farms at the centre of the project.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's farm index for the registration division will give it a farm number and a diagram; the cadastre pull in `data/fetch_cadastre.py` then places it on the map.
Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Leeukraal Nr. 24 (consolidated) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.