Deel van Van Aardsfontein Nr. 109

Meriba (Van Aardsfontein Nr. 109 Gdlt 5)

5/109 op die kadaster · wys op die kaart

Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.

Plaasnommer: Nr. 109
Gedeelte: 5
Op die kadaster: 5/109, gedeeltegeregistreer as VAN AARDSFONTEIN
Distrik: Prince Albert
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 1611.1 ha

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 42 km van Klaarstroom.

perseel Uitgesny uit Van Aardsfontein Nr. 109

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

undated boundary change subdivision: from Van Aardsfontein Nr. 109

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.

Navorsingsnotas

[1 Aug 2026] IN THE MODEL FROM THE CADASTRE PULL ONLY. The Surveyor-General has a polygon for it and this project has no document that names it, so it carries geometry, an extent and a name and no history. It is here because the parent farm PAR-000064 is on the map as a whole-farm outline and its own panel said in so many words that four modern parcels inside that outline were not in this model. These are those four. It was absent purely because nobody had made the row, not because anything was missing from the pull: data/geo/prince_albert_farm_portions.geojson has held this polygon all along and match_cadastre.py can only match parcels that exist. Cadastre: 1,927.9 ha, LPI C06100000000010900005. Van Aardsfontein is in the model because it is NAMED ON THE BOUNDARY of ground we hold, and as of 1 Aug 2026 the farm on the other side of that boundary is also in the model: Klipgat No. 114 (PAR-000103), whose 1911 diagram names "Remainder Van Aardens Fontein" as its eastern neighbour N-O.

[5 Aug 2026] extent_ha BLANKED. It held 1927.9 ha, which is this parcel's GEOM_AREA from the cadastre pull divided by 10 000 - the field the 5 Aug match_cadastre.py fix identified as inflated by 1/cos(lat), about 19.7% in this latitude, on 429 records. The fix corrected sg_area_ha (now 1611.1 ha, from Shape_Area) but extent_ha is hand-maintained and no check reads it, so the defective figure survived the correction and was being exported: extent_ha is in export_public.PUBLIC_COLUMNS. extent_ha means AN EXTENT A DOCUMENT STATES, and no document here states one for this parcel - this row's own note above says so. So it goes blank rather than being corrected to the polygon figure, which is what sg_area_ha already is.

[13 Aug 2026, SRC-436] NAMED FROM THE 2023 VALUATION ROLL, which gives this portion as "Meriba" (1593.3010 ha). This row previously read "Van Aardsfontein Portion 5 (No. 109 Ptn 5)", which was a farm-and-portion label rather than a name. The roll is a rates document and good evidence for what the ground is called now; it says nothing about what it was called when the portion was cut.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Oop vrae

141 people are on this site linked to nothing prioriteit 1 · LEAD-0074
Which parcels and people exist on the site as dead ends - reachable by a list, but linked to no document, story, owner or neighbour?

Wat dit sou uitmaak For the 106 tree-derived rows, a parentage pass merged from the family-tree on tree id - which 6 already names as the direction of travel and which would connect them wholesale rather than one at a time. For the three floating names, find the document each came from and link it.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Meriba (Van Aardsfontein Nr. 109 Gdlt 5) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.