Deel van Middelwater

Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 2

2/169 op die kadaster · wys op die kaart

Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.

Plaasnommer: Nr. 169
Gedeelte: 2
Op die kadaster: 2/169, gedeeltegeregistreer as MIDDLEWATER
Distrik: Prince Albert
Moderne opgemete oppervlakte: 936.9 ha

Waarom hierdie plaas hier is

Grond waarop 'n geskrewe geskiedenis afspeel. 6 km van Klaarstroom.

storie 'n Geskrewe geskiedenis speel op hierdie grond af Middelwater No. 169: a farm history
perseel Uitgesny uit Middelwater
perseel Left as the remainder: Restant (Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 2)
perseel Grond uit hierdie plaas gesny: Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 7

Stories

about this farm Middelwater Nr. 169: 'n plaasgeskiedenis
Van 'n leningsplaas in die Swartberg tot agt kadastrale persele: die gedokumenteerde geskiedenis van Middelwater Nr. 169 - Stretch se opmeting van 1833 vir Okert Oosthuizen, die toekenningsdag van 1841, die heropmeting van 1883 en die kwitrent van 1884 aan J.D.J. Oosthuysen 'and another', die gedeeltes wat afgesny is vir 'n fontein genaamd Vaste Water en 'n plek genaamd Avondrust, en die kraglynopmeting van 1990 waarvan die koördinate die plaas uiteindelik op 'n kaart gesit het.

Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde

undated boundary change subdivision: from Middelwater
undated boundary change remainder: becomes Restant (Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 2)
undated boundary change subdivision: becomes Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 7

Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken

Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.

Kadaster

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel

Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.

Navorsingsnotas

[9 Aug 2026] PORTION 2 IS 936.9 ha AND ITS REMAINDER IS 382.5. They are two cadastral records, W052C061000000000169000020 and ...000021, and this row had been pinned to the SECOND of them, so Portion 2 and the Remainder of Portion 2 were drawn as one piece of ground at one area. Re-pinned to ...000020.

AND THE DIFFERENCE IS PORTION 7. 936.9 less 382.5 is 554.4 ha, which is W052C061000000000169000070, Middelwater Portion 7 (PAR-000081), to the tenth of a hectare. So the ground cut out of Portion 2 to leave its Remainder is Portion 7. The 30 Jul note asked where it went and put the figure at 478.6 ha; that figure came from an earlier pairing of records and is wrong.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR ADDING THE FARM UP: count the Remainder of Portion 2 and Portion 7, or count Portion 2 alone, never both. Remainder-of-farm 378.4 + Ptn 1 2,351.7 + Ptn 2 RE 382.5 + Ptn 3 3,544.8 + Ptn 4 846.1 + Ptn 5 9.1 + Ptn 6 876.9 + Ptn 7 554.4 = 8,943.9 ha against the farm's 8,944.0.

No document this project holds names a Portion 2 of farm 169: it is absent from the 1883 verso deduction table (DOC-0039) and from the 1989 servitude map's list of the farm's parts (DOC-0040). It is in the Surveyor-General's cadastre only. [TO VERIFY]

[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Middelwater Portion 2" before. Nothing about the ground changed.

Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.

Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.

Wat die rekord kortkom

Nobody is on record as ever having held this third order · B8 never-held
Middelwater Nr. 169 Gdlt 2 is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.

What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.

Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand, each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data. The whole set is on the questions page.