Jacobus Johannes Petrus van Zyl
1862 – 1941
Verbinding met die Koup
Het grond in hierdie distrik gehou: Klipgat A (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 2) (1916-11-15).
Name
- Given
- Jacobus Johannes Petrus
- Surname
- van Zyl
The formal baptismal name and the name a person was actually called are both kept, and neither is derived from the other. Spelling drift between records is evidence, not noise.
Naaste familie
- Brothers and sisters
- Christiaan Hendrik Van Zyl
'n Lewe in die rekord
- 1862 gebore Born
- 15 November 1916 grond Held it, Klipgat A (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 2)
- 1941 oorlede Died
Grond waarop hulle op rekord is
- Klipgat A (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 2) held it · 15 November 1916
Navorsingsnotas
[FS, 5 Aug 2026] Son of Louis Daniel Francois van ZylM (PER-001385), who held Klipgat No. 114 to his death. Took KLIPGAT A, Portion 2 of Klipgat No. 114, on deed 8821 of 15 November 1916 - the deed immediately after his brother's. The deed as transcribed gives 'Jacobus J.P. van Zyl'; the full name and dates come from FamilySearch 2CY9-NVD. [TO VERIFY - deed 8821 would give the name in full]
These are working notes, not finished prose: they carry the reasoning, the corrections and the things still marked to verify. They are kept here so the page itself can read as what is known.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Wat die rekord kortkom
-
The record stops in 1916 and never resumes
second order · B2 trail-ends
Klipgat A (Klipgat Nr. 114 Gdlt 2) was worked as far as 1916-11-15, with Jacobus Johannes Petrus van ZylH the last owner on record. 110 years follow with nothing. Who held it after that, and is it still one farm?
What would settle it The current title deed traced backwards, each transfer names the one before it, or the Surveyor-General's subdivision diagrams, which are what usually explain a farm going quiet.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.
Elders
FamilySearch-profiel 2CY9-NVD