Deel van Wit Poortje Nr. 16
Wit Poortje Nr. 16 Gdlt 1 (formerly Gedeelte A)
1/16 op die kadaster · wys op die kaart
Die plaas se eie geskiedenis — die toekenning, die oorspronklike opmeting — sit op daardie bladsy.
- Plaasnommer
- Nr. 16
- Gedeelte
- 1
- Ook aangeteken as
- Wit PoortjeDIAGRAM, deduction table on SG 765/1873, DOC-0259WitpoortjieSRC-436, 2023 valuation roll
- Op die kadaster
- 1/16, gedeeltegeregistreer as WIT POORTJE
- Distrik
- Prince Albert
- Grootte, soos die kaart dit stel
- 2584 morgen 150 square roods
- Moderne opgemete oppervlakte
- 2213.2 ha
Die historiese grootte en die moderne opgemete oppervlakte is twee aparte metings en word hier nie aangebied asof hulle mekaar bevestig nie. Die eerste is wat 'n landmeter op 'n kaart geskryf het, gewoonlik in morg. Die tweede is wat die moderne kadaster teken.
Waarom hierdie plaas hier is
'n Stuk van 'n plaas wat reeds in hierdie model is. 45 km van Klaarstroom.
- perseel Uitgesny uit Wit Poortje Nr. 16
Wat die rekord hou, in volgorde
Nog geen gedateerde inskrywing op hierdie perseel nie. Dit staan op die kaart omdat die Landmeter-generaal 'n poligoon daarvoor het; die geskiedenis is nie oorgeskryf nie.
Ook begrens deur, soos die moderne kadaster dit teken
Grond wat aan hierdie plaas raak op die Landmeter-generaal se huidige poligone en wat geen kaart wat hier gehou word, noem nie. Afgelei uit die meetkunde, nie van 'n dokument afgelees nie.
Kadaster
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir hierdie perseel
Die Landmeter-generaal se kaartindeks vir die hele plaas — waar die oorspronklike opmeting van hierdie grond lê.
Navorsingsnotas
[9 Aug 2026, SRC-342] From the deduction table on the verso of SG 765/1873 (DOC-0259), which carries one row and no more: "Portion A", with the A struck through and 1 written in, 2584 morgen 150 square roods, deed 14.11.1938 - 11789. The Survey Records and Diagram No. columns are blank.
THE FARM WAS CUT EXACTLY IN HALF. Wit Poortje is 5,168 morgen 300 roods; this portion is 2,584 morgen 150 roods; the Remainder is 2,584 morgen 150 roods. The two halves differ by ZERO square roods. A division that lands on an exact half is a decision about shares, not a line drawn round ground somebody wanted. [TO VERIFY] who the two parties were, from deed 11789 of 14 November 1938.
"Portion A" is drawn on the face of the 1873 diagram. The copy this project holds was printed for the Surveyor-General on 11.8.1966, so that annotation is later work on an older sheet and is not contemporary with the 1872 survey.
[9 Aug 2026] THE MODERN POLYGON MATCHES THE 1938 FIGURE TO 0.014%. Pinned to W052C061000000000016000010 at 2,213.2 ha against 2,584 morgen 150 roods = 2,213.5 ha. A figure struck off a chain-and-compass survey of 1872, halved on paper in 1938, and a satellite-era cadastral polygon: three tenths of a hectare apart in two and a quarter thousand.
[13 Aug 2026] Renamed to the one form this model uses for every portion - the portion's own name, then the parent farm, its number and the portion in brackets - so that a name is legible in a list, a search result and a map popup without the reader having to know which farm number is which. It read "Wit Poortje Portion 1 (No. 16 Ptn 1, formerly Portion A)" before. Nothing about the ground changed.
Werknotas, hier gewys omdat dit 'n private navorsingsbou is.
Die werksnotas op hierdie werf word in Engels gehou en word nie vertaal nie. Hulle verander met elke navorsingsessie, en 'n vertaling sou uit pas raak met die oorspronklike. Alles anders — die stories, die getranskribeerde dokumente en die koppelvlak — is in Afrikaans.
Wat die rekord kortkom
-
Nobody is on record as ever having held this
third order · B8 never-held
Wit Poortje Nr. 16 Gdlt 1 (formerly Gedeelte A) is in the model and drawn on the map, and carries no ownership record of any kind, not a grant, not a transfer, not an occupation.
What would settle it The Surveyor-General's diagram for the farm number names the grantee and the date; the deed reference on it opens the transfer chain.
Found by breaks.py reading the model against itself, not written by hand,
each one is a shape of missing record, not a fault in the data.
The whole set is on the
questions page.